Archive for May, 2010

Published by Brunsell on 30 May 2010

Introducing #scichat on Twitter

#scichat will engage educators and scientists in an ongoing discussion with the goal of sharing ideas, growing professionally and improving the teaching of science. The discussion will be moderated by Eric Brunsell (Assistant Professor of Science Education at the University of Wisconsin Oshkosh) and Jeff Goldstein (Director of the National Center for Earth and Space Science Education). #scichat is a partnership of Edutopia, The National Center for Earth and Space Science Education and the University of Wisconsin Oshkosh Excel Center.

#scichat will start on Tuesday, June 8th at 9:00 PM (ET) / 6:00 PM (PT). A primer on how to use Twitter will be available soon.

Please use the poll below to select the topic that most interests you for our first discussion:

Published by Brunsell on 26 May 2010

A glimpse of the gulf catastrophe.

Published by Brunsell on 24 May 2010

Too Few Engineers for Boeing.

http://www.seattlepi.com/local/6420ap_wa_engineer_shortage.html

Bruckner, the chair of the only aeronautical engineering program in the Pacific Northwest, is facing a crisis: a malnourished budget and a bad case of student unpreparedness.
The best students are as good as they ever were, Bruckner said. But the rest aren't keeping pace with technological innovation in the industry.
Add this to the mix: The state's aerospace industry is in dire need of engineers. Demand consistently exceeds the state's production at a two-to-one ratio, and that supply gap is expected to widen as the industry's aging work force retires in droves.

The crisis calls into question Washington's place in the country's aerospace landscape, a big red flag as Boeing moves some operations to other states and countries.
But it means an even bigger question mark for the United States' competitive edge in engineering, especially as China and India ramp up efforts to produce a more educated work force.

"The U.S. is still at the forefront," Bruckner said. "But the U.S. has to be really careful and make investments in education in support of engineering."

Posted via email from

Published by Brunsell on 24 May 2010

Bill Gates Predicts the Future…

15 Years ago, Bill Gates wrote the book, The Road Ahead, which included quite a few predictions on the future of technology.  How did he do?  

From: "Bill Gates: More Profit Than Prophet"  in The Atlantic
http://www.theatlantic.com/business/archive/2010/05/bill-gates-more-profit-than-prophet/56982/

Correct:

The Wallet PC:  (1) Hello Smartphones.  (2) If Gates predicted it, why didn't Microsoft beat Apple to market?
Social Networking: Easier to keep up with distant friends & enable new companions. (Note:  The Atlantic says "Hit and Miss" — I disagree & think the premise of Gates comment was a definite hit.)
Videoconferencing:  Webcams are ubiquitous.

Wrong:

E-mail: Eliminate the need for many face-to-face meetings.
Wireless Networks: Mobile devices will send and receive messages, but too expensive and unusual to receive video.  Dead Wrong! (Perhaps this explains why Microsoft is playing catch up in the smartphone market.)
Online Shopping: You will be able to interact with the florist as she arranges the bouquet. 
The Internet vs. World Wide Web: The Internet is a bit player in the information highway of the future.
Privacy:  technology will enable privacy.


3/8  This shows that even the most technologically savvy are challenged to envision the near future.  As educators, we need to take this to heart.  What will our students need to be able to know and do in 15 years? I'll place my bets on Google's advice:

Our Googley Advice:  Major in Learning

Posted via email from

Published by Brunsell on 18 May 2010

math class needs a makeover

Published by Brunsell on 14 May 2010

Inspiring Students Through Space Simulations

Colleen Howard, of Mesa Public Schools in Arizona, recently won the PBS Teachers Innovation Award for her efforts to use space shuttle simulations to inspire thousands of kids while engaging them in realistic problem solving situations.

The simulation is driven by specialized software that prompts students to perform tasks to move the scenario forward. It occasionally throws problematic curveballs at the students.

In one problem-solving scenario inspired by the film Apollo 13, the simulation warns that the “O2 scrubbers” are on the fritz. Students have to figure out how to build a new one with improvised equipment—then communicate the construction details to the shuttle crew via radio.’

“The computer randomly generates these crisis situations,” Howard said.

In another, the shuttle commander gets sick, and students have to research illnesses and treatments in order to get the mission back on track.

To increase the reality of the situation, Howard keeps the kids in the different centers separated. They communicate through radio and texting in a “communications panel,” and see each other through streaming video. The comprehensive scenario lasts about four hours.

Howard’s efforts have a lasting impact on her students.  For example, Brianne Kiley, now in graduate school studying forensic science, fondly remembers her shuttle experience -

“I remember coming out of that and feeling so lucky to be a part of something that different and that special. And it really got me interested… in learning and applying what I’ve learned to whatever I’m doing. And that’s actually what kind of triggered me to go into the sciences in general,” Kiley said.

“What was neat about that program is that there is a direct correlation between that and what I’m doing today,” she said. “Part of why I’m doing what I’m doing in the forensics is… that everybody has their own specialty in what I’m doing… everybody has to work together for a common goal, and that common goal for me now is solving crime.

Read the entire article: http://www.takepart.com/news/2010/05/13/teacher-lands-pbs-award-for-innovative-space-program

Posted via email from

Published by Brunsell on 12 May 2010

Knight Science Journalism Tracker

The Knight Science Journalism Tracker is an awesome resource for educators (and students) that want to keep abreast of science news. KSJ provides a broad sampling of science news from around the country. Each post contains a summary of the news, some commentary and links to the original news sources. KSJ is a service of the Knight Science Journalism Fellowship at MIT.

Posted via email from

Published by Brunsell on 09 May 2010

MIT researchers print solar cell on paper

From MIT (http://www.greentechnologydaily.com/new-technologies/689-mit-researchers-print-solar-cell-on-paper):
"Scientists at the Eni-MIT Solar Frontiers Research Center have successfully printed thin-film solar on paper. By coating white sheets of paper with organic semiconductors, the researchers are, in effect, able to turn an everyday object into a current-producing device."

At present, these solar cells are not very efficient (max of 2%), but continued research should be able to improve this.  When efficiency increases, cheap solar cells could revolutionize energy production.

"If 0.3 percent of the U.S. were covered with photovoltaics with 10 percent efficiency, solar power could produce three times the country's needs, including a transition to electric vehicles, Bulovic said. For example, the easement strip on highways could be coated with material that could capture energy from the sun."

Posted via email from

Published by Brunsell on 08 May 2010

Shiny Objects, Classroom Practice and Professional Growth

Here are the slides for the presentation that Elizabeth Alderton and I will be giving at the 2010 WiscNet Future Technology Conference on May 10, 2010.  The presentation focuses on three research projects.  The first two projects are involve incorporating online discussions into traditional face to face courses - a high school biology course and an undergraduate elementary science methods course.  The third research project explores how classroom teachers are using Twitter for professional learning.

Published by Brunsell on 07 May 2010

Climate Change and the Integrity of Science

Download now or preview on posterous

climate_statement.pdf (441 KB)

255 members of the National Academies of Science signed this letter which appears in the May 7th issue of Science.  Members of the National Academies of Science are among the top scientists in the U.S. and the world. 

"We are deeply disturbed by the recent escalation of political assaults on scientists in general and on climate scientists in particular. All citizens should understand some basic scientific facts. There is always some uncertainty associated with scientific conclusions; science never absolutely proves anything. When someone says that society should wait until scientists are absolutely certain before taking any action, it is the same as saying society should never take action…

Scientific conclusions derive from an understanding of basic laws supported by laboratory experiments, observations of nature, and mathematical and computer modeling. Like all human beings, scientists make mistakes, but the scientific process is designed to find and correct them. This process is inherently adversarial— scientists build reputations and gain recognition not only for supporting conventional wisdom, but even more so for demonstrating that the scientific consensus is wrong and that there is a better explanation. That's what Galileo, Pasteur, Darwin, and Einstein did. But when some conclusions have been thoroughly and deeply tested, questioned, and examined, they gain the status of "well-established theories" and are often spoken of as "facts."  … Climate change now falls into this category: there is compelling, comprehensive, and consistent objective evidence that humans are changing the climate in ways that threaten our societies and the ecosystems on which we depend…

Many recent assaults on climate science and, more disturbingly, on climate scientists by climate change deniers, are typically driven by special interests or dogma, not by an honest effort to provide an alternative theory that credibly satisfies the evidence…

But there is nothing remotely identified in the recent events that changes the fundamental conclusions about climate change:

  1. The planet is warming due to increased concentrations of heat-trapping gases in our atmosphere. A snowy winter in Washington does not alter this fact.

  • Most of the increase in the concentration of these gases over the last century is due to human activities, especially the burning of fossil fuels and deforestation.
  • Natural causes always play a role in changing Earth's climate, but are now being overwhelmed by human-induced changes.
  • Warming the planet will cause many other climatic patterns to change at speeds unprecedented in modern times, including increasing rates of sea-level rise and alterations in the hydrologic cycle. Rising concentrations of carbon dioxide are making the oceans more acidic.
  • The combination of these complex climate changes threatens coastal communities and cities, our food and water supplies, marine and freshwater ecosystems, forests, high mountain environments, and far more.
  • …Much more can be, and has been, said by the world's scientific  societies, national academies, and individuals, but these conclusions  should be enough to indicate why scientists are concerned about what  future generations will face from business- as-usual practices…

    Society has two choices: we can ignore the science and hide  our heads in the sand and hope we are lucky, or we can act in the public  interest to reduce the threat of global climate change quickly and  substantively. The good news is that smart and effective actions are  possible. But delay must not be an option."

    Posted via email from

    Next »